Skip to content

2024-07-02

Participants

  • Gertian Mici
  • Johan Dahlqvist
  • Ling Zhang
  • Rasmus Olsson
  • Shakib Loveimi
  • Zakarya Ali
  • Gudmundur Hilmarsson
  • Card related identifiers changes affect Wallet, Lithic and Card Data
  • As Wallet is the PRNs' owner, Lithic area should handle mapping PRNs to card token
  • Card id (information stored today for Galileo cards in CardData) is not a necessary
    attribute for our Lithic implementation (except reporting?).
  • If we generate PRN as external reference id (rename in hydra).

Decisions

  • Wallet should generate PRNs as it is part of its domain (jira ticket)
    • PRNs should be generated on the base of a sequential number (CFSB expects this structure for debit card: "692xxxxxxxxx")
    • In Wallet table (TODO: find name of the table)
      • Store identity column
      • Create PRN prefix column
  • Store the following attributes
    • card token in Lithic and CardData areas (jira ticket)
    • PRN in Lithic and Wallet areas

Action items

  • list down other ids to consider (program token/id...?)
  • Ask Lithic/ CFSB
    • Should we create a prn per account and per card?
    • How does Lithic map their ids for reporting files?
    • In CFSB 'Account card' reporting Card Identifier (CAD) is requested but it is not part of the information shared by lithic (https://docs.lithic.com/reference/getcardbytoken). Why?